E. A. Burtt, dans Metaphysical foundations of modern physic remarque que, «dans toutes les études génétiques qui sont entreprises aujourd’hui avec une telle confiance, la nature précise et les assomptions de la pensée scientifique moderne elle-même n’ont jamais fait l’objet d’une recherche critique réellement désintéressée ». Si cela est vrai dans la science moderne, c’est surtout vrai dans la philosophie moderne. Demander quels sont les postulats d’un système quelconque est devenu une question habituelle, depuis que les mathématiques modernes ont mis (...) en question la vérité des postulats d’Euclide et que la logique moderne en a fait ensuite autant de ceux d’Aristote. On recherche ici quels sont les postulats fondamentaux des systèmes cartésiens. (shrink)

This article compares case studies to better understand how third grade teachers, serving low-income (including Title I) schools, adapted their instruction in the midst of a global pandemic to better support their students’ learning about locally-relevant civic issues. Civic perspective-taking components were embedded in the unit design with the aim of building deliberative, inclusive classrooms. The team designed lessons drawing from theories of culturally sustaining pedagogy. Using semi-structured interview data, we examined teachers’ reported thinking and perceptions about students’ needs and (...) their own struggles to deliver purposeful, equitable instruction. Findings indicate that as teachers collaboratively designed the lessons they discussed how to balance relevance and sensitivity in relation to content that mirrored students lived realities. This study advances our understanding of what challenges teachers overcome to integrate culturally-sustaining practices in their social studies instruction. (shrink)

In recent years, programs for training in research ethics have become widespread, but very little has been done to assess the effectiveness of this training. Because initial studies have failed to demonstrate a positive impact of research ethics training, this project defined two new outcome variables to be tested in a sample of graduate students at the University of California, San Diego. Trainees were surveyed to assess the role of ethics training in altering their perceptions about their own standards, or (...) their knowledge of options available to them if faced with ethical problems that might arise in conducting and reporting research. In response to a mailing of 505 anonymous questionnaires, 283 replies were received. Similar to previous studies, perceptions of standards were not significantly affected by hours spent in informal discussions about research ethics, in attending courses on research ethics, or in discussions of case studies. However, self-reported knowledge of options for facing research ethics problems was significantly increased in association with increased hours of discussion, class time, or case study discussion. Taken together, this study emphasizes the need for increased attention to the definition and assessment of the goals of research ethics training. (shrink)